You are here: Home / Publications / Discrimination begins in the Womb: Evidence of Sex-Selective Prenatal Investments

Discrimination begins in the Womb: Evidence of Sex-Selective Prenatal Investments

Bharadwaj, Prashant; & Lakdawala, Leah K. (2013). Discrimination begins in the Womb: Evidence of Sex-Selective Prenatal Investments. Journal of Human Resources, 48(1), 71-113.

Bharadwaj, Prashant; & Lakdawala, Leah K. (2013). Discrimination begins in the Womb: Evidence of Sex-Selective Prenatal Investments. Journal of Human Resources, 48(1), 71-113.

Octet Stream icon 2029.ris — Octet Stream, 1 kB (1369 bytes)

This paper investigates whether boys receive preferential prenatal treatment in a setting where son preference is present. Using micro health data from India, we highlight sex-selective prenatal investments as a new channel via which parents practice discriminatory behavior. We find that mothers visit antenatal clinics and receive tetanus shots more frequently when pregnant with a boy. Preferential prenatal treatment of males is greater in regions known to have strong son preference and among women whose previous children are female. We address other mechanisms such as selective recall, medical complications that might cause male fetuses to receive greater prenatal care in general, son preference-based fertility stopping rules and biases due to sex-selective abortions. Our calculations suggest that set- selective prenatal care in maternal tetanus vaccination explains between 2.6-7.2 percent of excess female neonatal mortality in India.




JOUR



Bharadwaj, Prashant
Lakdawala, Leah K.



2013


Journal of Human Resources

48

1

71-113






0022166X




2029