Make Measurable What Is Not So: National Monitoring of the Status of Persons with Intellectual Disability
1492.ris
—
Octet Stream,
1 kB (1488 bytes)
Background: Statistics are critical in holding governments accountable for the well-being of citizens with disability. International initiatives are underway to improve the quality of disability statistics, but meaningful ID data is exceptionally rare. Method: The status of ID data was evaluated in a review of 12 national statistical systems. Recurring data collection by national ministries was identified and the availability of measures of poverty, exclusion, and disadvantage was assessed. Results: A total of 131 recurring systems coordinated by 50 different ministries were identified. The majority included general disability but less than 25% of the systems screened ID. Of these, few provided policy-relevant data. Conclusions: The scope of ID data was dismal at best, though a significant statistical infrastructure exists for the integration of ID data. Advocacy will be necessary. There is no optimal form of data monitoring, and decisions regarding priorities in purpose, targeted audiences, and the goals for surveillance must be resolved.
JOUR
Fujiura, Glenn T.
Rutkowski-Kmitta, Violet
Owen, Randall
2010
Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability
35
4
244-258
1366-8250
10.3109/13668250.2010.519330
1492