Citation
Piernas, Carmen; Miles, Donna R.; Deming, Denise M.; Reidy, Kathleen C.; & Popkin, Barry M. (2016). Estimating Usual Intakes Mainly Affects the Micronutrient Distribution among Infants, Toddlers and Pre-Schoolers from the 2012 Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey. Public Health Nutrition, 19(6), 1017-1026. PMCID: PMC4755554Abstract
Objective: To compare estimates from one day with usual intake estimates to evaluate how the adjustment for within-person variability affected nutrient intake and adequacy in Mexican children.Design: In order to obtain usual nutrient intakes, the National Cancer Institute’s method was used to correct the first 24 h dietary recall collected in the entire sample (n 2045) with a second 24 h recall collected in a sub-sample (n 178). We computed estimates of one-day and usual intakes of total energy, fat, Fe, Zn and Na. Setting 2012 Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey. Subjects: A total of 2045 children were included: 0–5·9 months old (n 182), 6–11·9 months old (n 228), 12–23·9 months old (n 537) and 24–47·9 months old (n 1098). From these, 178 provided an additional dietary recall.
Results: Although we found small or no differences in energy intake (kJ/d and kcal/d) between one-day v. usual intake means, the prevalence of inadequate and excessive energy intake decreased somewhat when using measures of usual intake relative to one day. Mean fat intake (g/d) was not different between one-day and usual intake among children >6 months old, but the prevalence of inadequate and excessive fat intake was overestimated among toddlers and pre-schoolers when using one-day intake (P<0·05). Compared with usual intake, estimates from one day yielded overestimated prevalences of inadequate micronutrient intakes but underestimated prevalences of excessive intakes among children aged >6 months.
Conclusions: There was overall low variability in energy and fat intakes but higher for micronutrients. Because the usual intake distributions are narrower, the prevalence of inadequate/excessive intakes may be biased when estimating nutrient adequacy if one day of data is used.
URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980015002311Reference Type
Journal ArticleYear Published
2016Journal Title
Public Health NutritionAuthor(s)
Piernas, CarmenMiles, Donna R.
Deming, Denise M.
Reidy, Kathleen C.
Popkin, Barry M.
PMCID
PMC4755554ORCiD
Popkin - 0000-0001-9495-9324Miles - 0000-0001-9490-2096