Citation
Smith, Natalie R.; Mazzucca, Stephanie; Hall, Marissa G.; Hassmiller Lich, Kristen; Brownson, Ross C.; & Frerichs, Leah (2022). Opportunities to Improve Policy Dissemination by Tailoring Communication Materials to the Research Priorities of Legislators. Implementation Science Communications, 3(1), 24. PMCID: PMC8895761Abstract
BACKGROUND: Communicating research to policymakers is a complex and difficult process. Ensuring that communication materials have information or design aspects that appeal to groups of policymakers with different priorities could be a substantive improvement over current dissemination approaches. To facilitate a more nuanced design of policy communication materials and message framing, we identified and characterized groups of state legislators based on how they prioritize different characteristics of research.METHODS: We used deidentified data collected in 2012 on 862 state legislators belonging to the US liberal-moderate-conservative ideological spectrum and from all 50 US states. Legislators were grouped using latent class analysis based on how they prioritized 12 different characteristics of research (e.g., research is unbiased, presents data on cost-effectiveness, policy options are feasible). We fit initial models using 1-6 group solutions and chose the final model based on identification, information criteria, and substantive interpretation.
RESULTS: Most legislators placed a high priority on research that was understandable (61%), unbiased (61%), available at the time that decisions are made (58%), and brief and concise (55%). The best model identified four groups of state legislators. Pragmatic consumers (36%) prioritized research that was brief and concise, provided cost-effectiveness analyses, and was understandably written. Uninterested skeptics (30%) generally did not place a high priority on any of the research characteristics. Conversely, one-quarter of legislators (25%) belonged to the Highly Informed Supporters group that placed a high priority on most characteristics of research. Finally, Constituent-Oriented Decision Makers (9%) prioritized research that was relevant to their constituents, delivered by someone they knew or trusted, available at the time decisions were made, and dealt with an issue that they felt was a priority for state legislative action.
CONCLUSIONS: To maximize the impact of dissemination efforts, researchers should consider how to communicate with legislators who have distinct preferences, values, and priorities. The groups identified in this study could be used to develop communication materials that appeal to a wide range of legislators with distinct needs and preferences, potentially improving the uptake of research into the policymaking process. Future work should investigate how to engage skeptical legislators.
URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00274-6Reference Type
Journal ArticleYear Published
2022Journal Title
Implementation Science CommunicationsAuthor(s)
Smith, Natalie R.Mazzucca, Stephanie
Hall, Marissa G.
Hassmiller Lich, Kristen
Brownson, Ross C.
Frerichs, Leah