Do Users of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives Receive the Same Counseling Content as Other Modern Method Users? A Cross-Sectional, Multi-Country Analysis of Women’s Experiences with the Method Information Index in Six Sub-Saharan African Countries

Citation

Bullington, Brooke W.; Tumlinson, Katherine; Karp, Celia; Senderowicz, Leigh; Zimmerman, Linnea; Akilimali, Pierre A.; Zakirai, Musa S.; OlaOlorun, Funmilola M.; Kibira, Simon P. S.; & Makumbi, Frederick E., et al. (2022). Do Users of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives Receive the Same Counseling Content as Other Modern Method Users? A Cross-Sectional, Multi-Country Analysis of Women’s Experiences with the Method Information Index in Six Sub-Saharan African Countries. Contraception: X, 4, 100088. PMCID: PMC9676194

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There has been a growing focus on informed choice in contraceptive research. Because removal of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), including implants and IUDs, requires a trained provider, ensuring informed choice in the adoption of these methods is imperative. We sought to understand whether information received during contraceptive counseling differed among women using LARC and those using other modern methods of contraception.
STUDY DESIGN: We used cross-sectional data from Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda collected in 2019-2020 by the Performance Monitoring for Action project. We included 7969 reproductive-aged women who reported use of modern contraception. Our outcome of interest, information received during contraceptive counseling, was measured using a binary indicator of whether respondents answered "yes" to all 4 questions that make up the Method Information Index Plus (MII+). We used modified Poisson models to estimate the prevalence ratio between method type (LARC vs. other modern methods) and the MII+, controlling for individual- and facility-level covariates.
RESULTS: Reported receipt of the full MII+ during contraceptive counseling ranged from 21% in the DRC to 51% in Kenya. In all countries, a higher proportion of LARC users received the MII+ compared to other modern method users. A greater proportion of LARC users answered "yes" to all questions that make up the MII+ at the time of counseling compared to other modern method users in DRC, Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of reporting the full MII+ between users of LARC and other modern methods in Burkina Faso (Adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR): 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91, 1.48) and Côte d'Ivoire (aPR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.87, 1.45).
CONCLUSION: Information received during contraceptive counseling was limited for all modern contraceptive users. LARC users had significantly higher prevalence of receiving the MII+ compared to other modern method users in the DRC, Kenya, and Uganda. Family planning programs should ensure that all women receive complete, unbiased contraceptive counseling.
IMPLICATIONS: Across 6 sub-Saharan African countries, a substantial proportion reproductive-aged women using contraception did not report receiving comprehensive counseling when they received their method. Women using long-acting reversible contraception received more information compared to women using other modern methods in the DRC, Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda after controlling for individual- and facility-level factors.

URL

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conx.2022.100088

Reference Type

Journal Article

Year Published

2022

Journal Title

Contraception: X

Author(s)

Bullington, Brooke W.
Tumlinson, Katherine
Karp, Celia
Senderowicz, Leigh
Zimmerman, Linnea
Akilimali, Pierre A.
Zakirai, Musa S.
OlaOlorun, Funmilola M.
Kibira, Simon P. S.
Makumbi, Frederick E.
Shiferaw, Solomon

Article Type

Regular

PMCID

PMC9676194

Data Set/Study

Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) Project

Continent/Country

Democratic Republic of Congo
Nigeria
Kenya
Uganda

ORCiD

Bullington - 0000-0002-3341-087X
Tumlinson - 0000-0001-8314-8219